Petitioner's sole contention, as limited by his brief, is that he qualified for retirement benefits pursuant to section 75-h (subd c, par [2]) of the Retirement and Social Security Law. He retired after 3 years, 10 months of State employment following approximately 25 years of accredited service with the Village of Solvay. At oral argument, respondent conceded that the record lacked substantial evidence as to whether the Village of Solvay maintained a retirement plan with...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
