1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 667 P.2d
  5. 667 P.2d 529 (1983)
 

SAIF v. MADDOX

No. SC 29212, CA A23313.

667 P.2d 529 (1983)

295 Or. 448

IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPENSATION OF CHARLES MADDOX, Claimant. State Accident Insurance Fund Corporation, Petitioner On Review, v. Charles MADDOX, Respondent On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided August 2, 1983.

Rehearing Denied September 7, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Darrell E. Bewley, Appellate Counsel for State Acc. Ins. Fund, Salem, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner on review.

Linda C. Love, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With her on the briefs was Rolf Olson, P.C., Salem.

ROBERTS, Justice.

This workers' compensation case presents the question whether the compensability of a claim must be determined finally before the extent of disability may be litigated. Specifically, SAIF Corporation asks this court to determine whether the Workers' Compensation Board and its referees have jurisdiction to enter orders rating extent of disability where the condition of claimant previously has been found to be compensable but that issue is the subject...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases