Order affirmed, with costs.
The denial of appellants' motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence was not an abuse of discretion inasmuch as appellants failed to demonstrate that the evidence would probably have produced a different result had it been introduced at trial or that the evidence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under CPLR 4404 (CPLR 5015, subd [a], par 2; see, also, Levantino v Insurance Co. of North...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
