1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 723 F.2d
  5. 723 F.2d 455 (1983)
 

MEAD DIGITAL SYSTEMS, INC. v. A.B. DICK CO.

Nos. 82-3163, 82-3178.

723 F.2d 455 (1983)

MEAD DIGITAL SYSTEMS, INC.; Mead Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. A.B. DICK COMPANY and Gould, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided December 8, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard P. Krisher, David C. Greer, Bieser, Greer & Landis, Dayton, Ohio, Dugald S. McDougall, argued, Keith V. Rockey, Chicago, Ill., for defendants-appellants, plaintiffs-appellants, cross-appellees.

Armistead W. Gilliam, Smith & Schnacke, Dayton, Ohio, Bill Durkee, argued, Edward W. Goldstein, Arnold, White & Durkee, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee, defendant-appellee, cross-appellant.

Before KEITH and MERRITT, Circuit Judges, WISEMAN, District Judge.

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

This patent infringement case concerns a new form of printing whereby printer's ink is guided onto paper or other recording media by electrical charges applied to ink streaming from small nozzles, rather than by conventional type, press, pen or other contact. The process, called "ink jet printing," is now used by businesses which require high speed printing or printing on soft or other unusual surfaces. Ink jet printers are particularly well...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases