NAVEL ORANGE ADMIN. COMMITTEE v. EXETER ORANGE CO.

Nos. 82-4333, 82-4548.

722 F.2d 449 (1983)

NAVEL ORANGE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EXETER ORANGE COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant, UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EXETER ORANGE CO., INC., Sequoia Orange Co., Inc., Sequoia Enterprises Inc., Carl A. Pescosolido, Jr., Marvin L. Wilson and Oleah H. Wilson, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided November 15, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Aaron B. Kahn, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.

Victor M. Epport, Epport & Delevine, Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Before GOODWIN, TANG and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.


GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.

Navel Orange Administrative Committee (NOAC), created under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, 7 U.S.C. § 601, et seq., to regulate the market for navel oranges from Arizona and part of California under a marketing order set forth in 7 C.F.R. § 907, et seq., sued Exeter Orange Co. (Exeter) for unpaid assessments levied pursuant to the Act. NOAC prevailed on a motion for summary judgment. Exeter appeals...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases