MABE v. REAL ESTATE COM'N

No. 8997.

670 P.2d 459 (1983)

Dr. Roy K. MABE and Karen K. Mabe, Applicants-Appellants v. REAL ESTATE COMMISSION, State of Hawaii, Respondent-Appellee.

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii.

September 26, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Owen K. Tamamoto, Honolulu (Nelson S.W. Chang, Honolulu, with him on briefs, Rother, Bybee & Chang, Honolulu, of counsel), for applicants-appellants.

Sidney K. Ayabe, Honolulu (Libkuman, Ventura, Ayabe & Hughes, Honolulu, of counsel), for respondent-appellee.

Before BURNS, C.J., and HEEN and TANAKA, JJ.


BURNS, Chief Judge.

Dr. Roy K. Mabe and Karen K. Mabe (Mabes) sought payment of $20,000 from the real estate recovery fund (Fund). They appeal from the final order awarding them $10,000. We reverse.

The general issue is whether a literal construction of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 467-16 (1976), which is unambiguous, would produce an absurd or unjust result which would be clearly inconsistent with the purposes and policies of the statute. Our answer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases