BILLINGS, Justice.
The defendant was charged and convicted of driving in excess of the 35 mph speed limit imposed by a Colchester town ordinance. Defendant appeals, claiming the State failed to prove due enactment of the ordinance pursuant to 23 V.S.A. § 1007. More specifically, he claims that the State did not prove that the speed limit was adopted as a result and on the basis of the requisite engineering and traffic investigation. 23 V.S.A. § 1007(a)....
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
