GOULD v. MOSSINGHOFF

No. 82-2091.

711 F.2d 396 (1983)

Gordon GOULD, Appellant, v. Gerald J. MOSSINGHOFF, Honorable Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, in his official capacity.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided July 12, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William L. Mentlik, Westfield, N.J., with whom Roy H. Wepner, and Richard I. Samuel, Westfield, N.J., were on the brief for appellant.

Fred E. McKelvey, Associate Sol., with whom Joseph F. Nakamura, Sol., Washington, D.C., were on the brief for appellee.

Before WALD and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges, and SWYGERT, Senior Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.


Opinion for the Court filed by HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge.

HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge:

In 1977, appellant Gordon Gould applied for a patent on certain laser technology. When the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks ("PTO") rejected the application in toto for inadequate disclosure of the claimed invention, appellant sought de novo review in the District Court. The court did not address the merits of the inadequacy of disclosure issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases