BOWERS MECHANICAL, INC. v. KENT ASSOCIATES

80-209-E; CA A24139.

664 P.2d 436 (1983)

63 Or.App. 414

BOWERS MECHANICAL, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Plaintiff, v. KENT ASSOCIATES, an Illinois Limited Partnership; Hanover Grant, Inc., an Illinois Corporation; Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company, a California Corporation; Edward C. Wall; Roby's Enterprises, Inc., an Oregon Corporation; West Pacific Electrical Distributors, Inc., an Oregon Corporation; Harder Mechanical Contractors, Inc., an Oregon Corporation; S.S. Kresge Company, a Michigan Corporation; Harley S. Dietz and Deitz Construction Co., a Partnership; George B. Smith; Toivo Huuskonen; Lavin Roofing Company, Inc., an Illinois Corporation; George W. Gillock and Lynette E. Gillock Doing Business As West Coast Striping Service; Whittle Enterprises, Inc., an Oregon Corporation Doing Business As Cut-N-Break; Copeland Paving, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Defendants, the Douglas Co., an Oregon Corporation, Appellant, v. Ronald L. Crume and Rod Crume, Co-Partners Doing Business As R. Crume Co., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 8, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Murphy, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With him on brief was Cass, Scott, Woods & Smith, Eugene.

Richard A. Stark, Medford, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Haviland & Stark, Medford.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Douglas Company (Douglas) appeals from a summary judgment for defendants Crume (Crume) on Crume's crossclaim to foreclose a construction lien against Douglas. The question is whether the trial court erred in refusing to consider an affidavit opposing Crume's motion which Douglas mailed to Crume's attorney prior to a hearing on the motion, but which was not received until after the hearing.

On January 9, 1981, Crume filed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases