Judgment affirmed and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5).
Upon analysis it will be seen that defendant was subjected to four customs inspections or examinations. The first (by Inspector Steinkamp) was an admittedly permissible routine customs border inspection (see US Code, tit 19, § 1582; United States v Ramsey,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.