HATFIELD v. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE

No. 82-250.

647 S.W.2d 450 (1983)

278 Ark. 544

Herbert HATFIELD, et ux., Appellants, v. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, Arkansas, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

March 14, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Murphy & Carlisle, Fayetteville, for appellants.

James N. McCord, II, City Atty., Fayetteville, for appellee.


ADKISSON, Chief Justice.

The appellants own real property, zoned commercial, at 240 North College in the City of Fayetteville. In 1960, at a cost of $3,000.00 the appellants installed on-site free-standing signs to advertise the retail automobile dealership operated by them at that location.

When installed, the appellants' signs complied with all applicable city ordinances. On December 19, 1972, a comprehensive sign ordinance (Ordinance No. 1893) was adopted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases