STATE v. POMO


95 N.J. 13 (1983)

468 A.2d 428

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ANTHONY POMO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 14, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marc J. Friedman, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (George L. Schneider, Essex County Prosecutor, attorney).

Joel M. Miklacki argued the cause for respondent.


PER CURIAM.

This appeal presents the issue whether a defendant, who at the time of sentencing in the municipal court misrepresents his prior record of convictions, is immune from sentence enhancement when he appeals his conviction to the Superior Court, Law Division, for a trial de novo on the record. No question has been raised on the appeal concerning the defendant's right of allocution or the right to refuse to furnish information about a prior conviction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases