1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 657 S.W.2d
  5. 657 S.W.2d 430 (1983)
 

CITY OF LONGVIEW v. STATE EX REL. SPRING HILL

No. C-1795.

657 S.W.2d 430 (1983)

The CITY OF LONGVIEW, Texas, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Texas ex rel SPRING HILL UTILITY DISTRICT et al., Respondent.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Rehearing Denied September 21, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Earl Roberts, Jr., Longview, Olson & Olson, Houston, for petitioner.

Carter Beckworth, Dist. Atty., Kenley, Boyland, Coghlan & Griffin, Herbert Boyland, Longview, Leonard, Koehn, Rose & Hurt, Thomas W. Leonard, Dallas, for respondent.

POPE, Chief Justice.

The State of Texas, on relation of Spring Hill Utility District, instituted this quo warranto action contesting the validity of ordinances by the City of Longview that annexed the district. The trial court held that the annexation was valid, but the court of appeals held that the annexation was invalid. 642 S.W.2d 544 (1982). We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and affirm the trial court judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases