1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 655 S.W.2d
  5. 655 S.W.2d 426 (1983)
 

TUCKER ENTERPRISES, INC. v. HARTJE

Nos. 82-191, 82-192.

655 S.W.2d 426 (1983)

280 Ark. 164

TUCKER ENTERPRISES, INC. d/b/a Mr. Mobile Homes and Centurion Homes Corporation, Petitioners, v. George F. HARTJE, Judge, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

July 11, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Highsmith, Gregg, Hart, Farris & Rutledge by John C. Gregg, Batesville, for petitioners.

Stephen E. James, Clinton, for respondents.

Respondent's petition to correct error is denied.

HOLT and PURTLE, JJ., would grant.

PURTLE, Justice, dissenting.

I do not think the Lovettes should be required to pay the costs in this petition for prohibition. They were incorrectly named as respondents and appeared only to try to extricate themselves from the proceeding. The petitioners were successful in prohibiting the judge from hearing the case on its merits. Since we do not require the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases