CONRAD v. CONRAD

No. 82-750.

425 So.2d 649 (1983)

William J. CONRAD, Jr., Appellant, v. Barbara M. Methfessel CONRAD, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

January 25, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gars, Dixon & Shapiro and Robert Dixon, Miami, for appellant.

Ferrell & Ferrell and Milton Ferrell, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

The parties to this appeal agreed at oral argument that the second and third issues involved in this appeal had been resolved between them leaving only the question of whether the trial court abused his discretion in awarding the wife the marital home as lump sum alimony. We affirm the trial court since no clear abuse of discretion is demonstrated on this record. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases