ARONEY v. CALIFORNIA HORSE RACING BD.

Docket No. 66712.

145 Cal.App.3d 928 (1983)

193 Cal. Rptr. 708

THEODORE A. ARONEY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA HORSE RACING BOARD, Defendant and Respondent; HOLLYWOOD PARK RACE TRACK, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

February 16, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Arthur A. Lewis, Russell Iungerich and Judith M. Mitchell for Plaintiff and Appellant.

George Deukmejian and John K. Van de Kamp, Attorneys General, and Marilyn K. Mayer, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendant and Respondent.

Iverson, Joakum, Papiano & Hatch and Kerry McGuinn for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.


OPINION

COMPTON, Acting P.J.

Appeal from the denial of a petition for administrative mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5), which petition sought to compel the California Horse Racing Board (Board) to vacate its order barring petitioner, Theodore Aroney, from entering or wagering at the Hollywood Park Race Track (Hollywood).1

Petitioner, after...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases