PEOPLE v. HOWARD


60 N.Y.2d 999 (1983)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Norman Howard, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided December 1, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. Irene Elliott for appellant.

Elizabeth Holtzman, District Attorney (Lisa Margaret Smith and Barbara D. Underwood of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE concur.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The charge on recent and exclusive possession was not error. The circumstances of the case were such that defendant was either guilty of stealing from the complainant or guilty of nothing. Unlike People v Baskerville (60 N.Y.2d 374), there was, therefore, no need to charge with respect to the crime of possession...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases