1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 672 P.2d
  5. 672 P.2d 379 (1983)
 

METCALF v. AFSD

No. 5-2401-AE3124-1; CA A28769.

672 P.2d 379 (1983)

65 Or.App. 761

Raymond METCALF and Betty Metcalf, Petitioners, v. ADULT AND FAMILY SERVICES DIVISION, Leo Hegstrom, Dir., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 30, 1983.

Reconsideration Denied January 13, 1984.

Review Denied February 8, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert M. Atkinson, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

Michael D. Reynolds, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Deputy Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

WARREN, Judge.

Petitioners seek reversal of an order of Adult and Family Services Division (AFS), which terminated their general assistance benefits on a determination that petitioner, Betty Metcalf, was not unemployable under the criteria of OAR 461-05-311 and 461-05-316.1 They claim that the order failed to demonstrate a rational connection between the findings of fact and the conclusion, that AFS erroneously placed the burden of proof...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases