STATE v. CRAIG

No. 257A82.

302 S.E.2d 740 (1983)

STATE of North Carolina v. Andrew Weddington CRAIG, Francis Marion Anthony.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 31, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. by Asst. Atty. Gen. Charles M. Hensey, Raleigh, for the State.

W. Erwin Spainhour, Concord, for defendant-appellant Andrew Weddington Craig.

James C. Johnson, Jr., Concord, for defendant-appellant Francis Marion Anthony.


COPELAND, Justice.

GUILT PHASE—CRAIG

I.

In his first argument the defendant, Craig, contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion for a polygraph examination to be conducted by the State Bureau of Investigation at the expense of the State. The defendant maintains that by refusing his request the trial court denied him a valuable tool which could have bolstered his credibility at trial and would have aided his attorney's preparation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases