SURRICK v. HOFFMAN


500 Pa. 533 (1983)

458 A.2d 940

Robert B. SURRICK, Plaintiff, v. Honorable J. Sydney HOFFMAN, Defendant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided April 27, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert B. Surrick, Media, pro se, Robert P. Cummins, pro-hoc-vice, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Stephen M. Feldman, Philadelphia, for defendant.

Before ROBERTS, C.J., and NIX, LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, HUTCHINSON and ZAPPALA, JJ.


ORDER

PER CURIAM:

No merit having been found in plaintiff's objections to the unanimous order of the full Court dated January 26, 1983, the complaint in quo warranto is dismissed and judgment entered in favor of defendant.

NIX, J., files a dissenting opinion in which McDERMOTT, J., joins.

NIX, Justice, dissenting.

Under Article 5 of the Constitution of this Commonwealth, as amended in 1968...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases