STATE v. KING

No. 82AP-877.

10 Ohio App. 3d 93 (1983)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. KING, APPELLANT.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Franklin County.

Decided June 7, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Michael Miller, prosecuting attorney, and Ms. Karen L. Martin, for appellee.

Messrs. Schnorf, Wanick, Loyd & Engwert, Mr. David M. Schnorf, Mr. Christopher C. Loyd and Ms. Kelly D. Stimpson, for appellant.


WHITESIDE, P.J.

Defendant, Leo T. King, appeals from his conviction in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas of one count of auto theft and raises two assignments of error, as follows:

"1. The failure of the trial court to instruct the jury on the laws relating to partnerships constitutes prejudicial and reversible error.

"2. The court erred in its failure to grant defendant's motion for new trial."

Defendant was indicted on two counts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases