ALLEN v. SUTTER COUNTY BD. OF EQUALIZATION

Docket No. 21737.

139 Cal.App.3d 887 (1983)

189 Cal. Rptr. 101

GERALD F. ALLEN, as County Assessor, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SUTTER COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, Defendant and Respondent; JAMES C. VAN DYKE et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

February 14, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Darrell W. Larsen, County Counsel, and Dwaine F. Shields, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Rich, Fuidge, Marsh & Morris and John Sanbrook for Defendant and Respondent.

James C. Van Dyke, in pro. per., and Van Dyke, Shaw & Schuckman for Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.


OPINION

EVANS, Acting P.J.

Article XIII A, section 1, subdivision (a), of the California Constitution provides: "The maximum amount of any ad valorem tax on real property shall not exceed one percent (1%) of the full cash value of such property...." Section 2, subdivision (a), provides: "The full cash value means the county assessor's valuation of real property as shown on the 1975-76 tax bill under `full cash value' or, thereafter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases