1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 330 N.W.2d
  5. 330 N.W.2d 693 (1983)
 

HOLMAN ERECT. CO. v. ORVILLE E. MADSEN & SONS

No. C2-82-926.

330 N.W.2d 693 (1983)

HOLMAN ERECTION COMPANY, Appellant, v. ORVILLE E. MADSEN & SONS, INC., Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

March 4, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dosland, Dosland & Nordhougen, Moorhead, for appellant.

Briggs & Morgan, Steven Halverson, St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.

YETKA, Justice.

Plaintiff-appellant Holman Erection Company (Holman) commenced an action against Orville Madsen & Sons, Inc., (Madsen), alleging that Madsen had breached a construction contract. Holman claims that Madsen accepted Holman's bid on a subcontract, and thereby formed a contract, by listing Holman as a proposed subcontractor in a general contract bid Madsen submitted to the City of Moorhead. Holman sought the profits it argued it had lost when Madsen...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases