ZEEK v. EMPLOYMENT DIV.

No. 82-AB-1731; A26613.

672 P.2d 349 (1983)

65 Or.App. 515

Sally ZEEK, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION AND MOLALLA SCHOOL DISTRICT 35, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 9, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Meadowbrook, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Theresa L. Wright, Salem.

William F. Nessly, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Employment Div. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Stanton F. Long, Deputy Atty. Gen., and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.

No appearance for respondent Molalla School Dist. 35.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and NEWMAN, JJ.


NEWMAN, Judge.

Petitioner has been a school secretary at Molalla Grade School since 1976. She sought unemployment compensation benefits for the period that she was unemployed between the 1981-82 and 1982-83 academic years. The Employment Appeals Board (EAB) denied her claim. We affirm.

Molalla School District No. 35 operated its school on a 12-month academic year. Petitioner worked 12 months each year. In May, 1982, the voters defeated the district's proposed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases