1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 143 Cal.App.3d
  5. 143 Cal.App.3d 878 (1983)
 

VIVITAR CORP. v. BROIDY

Docket No. 66265.

143 Cal.App.3d 878 (1983)

192 Cal. Rptr. 281

VIVITAR CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STEVE BROIDY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

June 14, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Arthur Livingston for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, Richard M. Mosk, Patricia H. Benson and Michael Barclay for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

COMPTON, Acting P.J.

This appeal is taken from an order of the superior court disqualifying and prohibiting the law firm of Klinger and Leevan from representing plaintiffs in an action filed in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. We reverse.

The issue presented is whether a conflict of interest requiring recusal of counsel exists when counsel for a trustee in bankruptcy is retained to represent some of the bankrupt...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases