MUKA v. NYS BAR ASSN.


120 Misc.2d 897 (1983)

Betty O. Muka, Plaintiff, v. New York State Bar Association, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Tompkins County.

August 3, 1983


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

DeGraff, Foy, Conway, Holt-Harris & Mealey (Robert H. Iseman and F. Douglas Novotny of counsel), for defendant. Betty O. Muka, plaintiff pro se.


HOWARD A. ZELLER, J.

Defendant New York State Bar Association moves to dismiss the amended complaint of plaintiff Betty O. Muka on several grounds, including collateral estoppel, res judicata, the Statute of Limitations, and failure to state a cause of action. Mrs. Muka, who appears pro se, has filed an affidavit and exhibits in opposition.

THE AMENDED COMPLAINT

The amended...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases