1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 96 A.D.2d
  5. 96 A.D.2d 918 (1983)
 

MATTER OF GRANCIO v. COVENEY

96 A.D.2d 918 (1983)

In the Matter of Anthony Grancio, Appellant, v. Frank Coveney et al., onstituting The Board of Elections of the County of Suffolk, et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

August 24, 1983

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The court properly dismissed the application because, as conceded, petitioner failed to serve notice of specifications of objections as required by 9 NYCRR 6204.1 (b). In addition, we note that candidates for a judicial office are exempt from the authorization requirement of subdivision 3 of section 6-120 of the Election Law (see Matter of Grancio v Coveney, 96 A.D.2d 917

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases