UMET TRUST v. SANTA MONICA MEDICAL INVESTMENT CO.

Docket No. 63839.

140 Cal.App.3d 864 (1983)

189 Cal. Rptr. 922

UMET TRUST, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, v. SANTA MONICA MEDICAL INVESTMENT COMPANY et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants; SONNENBLICK-GOLDMAN OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Cross-defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

March 16, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Beardsley, Hufstedler & Kemble for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant.

Fierstein & Sturman, Harvey Fierstein and Edward C. Broffman for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.

Troy, Malin, Pottinger & Casden, D.W. Hunt and David J. Wohlberg for Cross-defendant and Appellant.


OPINION

EAGLESON, J.*

Although there are cross-appeals, the primary issue in this case is whether the court should apply the general rule that ordinarily a litigant must bear his own attorney's fees (Code Civ. Proc., § 1021) or allow attorney's fees to appellant under the "exceptional circumstances" doctrine articulated in California by the Supreme Court in Prentice v. North Amer. Title...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases