INDUS., TECHNICAL AND PROF. EMP. DIV. v. N. L. R. B.

Nos. 81-7470, 81-7481 and 81-7584.

683 F.2d 305 (1982)

INDUSTRIAL, TECHNICAL AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES DIVISION, NATIONAL MARITIME UNION OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, and Monfort of Colorado, Inc., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided July 26, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sidney H. Kalban, New York City, argued for petitioner; Sidney H. Kalban, Phillips & Cappiello, New York City, James C. Zalewski, Tate, Bruckner & Skyes, Lincoln, Neb., on brief.

James Y. Callear, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before MERRILL and HUG, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, District Judge.


HUG, Circuit Judge:

The National Labor Relations Board (the "Board") found that Monfort of Colorado, Inc. ("Monfort") violated §§ 8(a)(1) and (2) of the National Labor Relations Act ("Act"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(1) and (2), by giving unlawful assistance and support to the National Maritime Union ("NMU") and by recognizing, and entering into a collective bargaining agreement with, NMU at a time when NMU did not represent an uncoerced majority of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases