On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, with costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment denied. Questions of fact exist as to when plaintiff's treatment was "completed" and as to whether the August 29, 1974 visit was a timely return visit within the scope of the continuous treatment doctrine enunciated in McDermott v Torre (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
GUDMUNDSON v. AXELROD
57 N.Y.2d 930 (1982)
Halldor Gudmundson et al., Appellants, v. Edward H. Axelrod, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 21, 1982.
Decided October 21, 1982.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.