1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 552 F.Supp.
  5. 552 F.Supp. 394 (1982)
 

BAXTER v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION

Civ. A. No. 82-2855.

552 F.Supp. 394 (1982)

Nathan L. BAXTER v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

December 8, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathan L. Baxter, in pro. per.

Jonathan F. Altman, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, District Judge.

The sole question presented by defendant's motion for summary judgment1 involves construction of Fed.R.Civ.P. 3 which provides that "[a] civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the Court". Specifically, defendant, Consolidated Rail Corporation, asserts that plaintiff's claim is time-barred and argues that although the application to proceed in forma pauperis was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases