1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 536 F.Supp.
  5. 536 F.Supp. 409 (1982)
 

TACKETT v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP.

No. C-3-78-250.

536 F.Supp. 409 (1982)

Delbert C. TACKETT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.

March 26, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. B. Blumenstiel, Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

David C. Greer, Dayton, Ohio, for defendant.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT N.O.V.

CARL B. RUBIN, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on a Motion for a New Trial filed by plaintiffs and for Motion for Judgment Non Obstante Veredicto by the defendant. For the reasons stated below each of such Motions is hereby denied.

In plaintiffs' Motion for a New Trial, 11 grounds are asserted suggesting error by the Court. The accident in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases