The defendants-respondents were charged by an information dated November 29, 1980, with disorderly conduct in violation of subdivisions 1, 2 and 5 of section 240.20 of the Penal Law. Defendants-respondents moved in Rochester City Court before Judge WILLIAM H. BRISTOL, to dismiss the accusatory instruments on the grounds that the information was defective and that subdivisions 1, 2 and 5 of section 240.20 of the Penal Law were unconstitutional...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.