Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
The affirmative defense pleaded, that "[t]he jurisdiction in the instant case, if any is in Rem", is not the "sufficiently particularized" objection to quasi in rem jurisdiction necessary to preserve the objection and thereby obtain dismissal based on a retroactive application of Rush v Savchuk (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.