1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 678 F.2d
  5. 678 F.2d 257 (1982)
 

THOMPSON v. SAWYER

Nos. 80-2098, 80-2099, 80-2429 and 80-2495.

678 F.2d 257 (1982)

Dorothy M. THOMPSON, et al., Appellants, v. Danford L. SAWYER, Jr., Public Printer, Individually and as Public Printer of the United States, and his agents, assigns and successors in office. Dorothy M. THOMPSON, et al., v. Danford L. SAWYER, Jr., Public Printer, Individually and as Public Printer of the United States, and his agents, assigns and successors in office, Appellant. Dorothy M. THOMPSON, et al., v. Danford L. SAWYER, Jr., Public Printer, Individually and as Public Printer of the United States, and his agents, assigns and successors in office, Appellant. Dorothy M. THOMPSON, et al., Appellants, v. Danford L. SAWYER, Jr., Public Printer, Individually and as Public Printer of the United States, and his agents, assigns and successors in office.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided April 27, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert C. Seldon, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., with whom Charles F. C. Ruff, U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., at the time the brief was filed, Royce C. Lamberth, Kenneth M. Raisler and David H. Shapiro, Asst. U. S. Attys., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for Sawyer, et al., appellants in Nos. 80-2099 and 80-2429, and cross-appellees in Nos. 80-2098 and 80-2495.

Nora A. Bailey and David M. Dorsen, Washington, D. C., with whom Roderic V. O. Boggs, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for Thompson, et al., appellees in Nos. 80-2099 and 80-2429 and cross-appellants in Nos. 80-2098 and 80-2495.

Before ROBB, MIKVA and GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge MIKVA.

Opinion dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge ROBB.

MIKVA, Circuit Judge:

This multi-faceted sex discrimination suit was brought by women bindery workers at the Government Printing Office (GPO). They sought relief under two statutes: the Equal Pay Act of 1963, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) (1976), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases