1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 642 S.W.2d
  5. 642 S.W.2d 286 (1982)
 

TINSLEY v. CROSS DEVELOPMENT CO.

No. 82-80.

642 S.W.2d 286 (1982)

277 Ark. 306

G.L. TINSLEY et al., Appellants, v. CROSS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY et al., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

Rehearing Denied December 20, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of Worth Camp by Worth Camp, Jr., El Dorado and Honey & Rodgers, Prescott, for appellants.

Brown, Compton & Prewett, Ltd. by Robert C. Compton, El Dorado, for appellees.

HICKMAN, Justice.

The only question of concern to us in this case is whether the trial court was wrong in denying a motion for a new trial. The law requires that if we find any substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury, the trial court's decision will be affirmed. Ferrell v. Whittington, 271 Ark. 750, 610 S.W.2d 572 (1981). We find substantial evidence and affirm the trial court's decision.

This lawsuit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases