1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 69 Ohio
  5. 69 Ohio St. 2d 23 (1982)
 

CITY OF EAST CLEVELAND v. BD. OF COUNTY COMMRS.

No. 80-1609.

69 Ohio St. 2d 23 (1982)

CITY OF EAST CLEVELAND, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY ET AL., APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 13, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Walter, Haverfield, Buescher & Chockley and Mr. Henry B. Fisher, for appellant and cross-appellee.

Mr. John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, Mr. Thomas P. Gill and Mr. Patrick Carroll, for appellees and cross-appellants.

KRUPANSKY, J.

For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

I.

The primary issue raised in the instant cause is whether the zoning provisions of a municipality may restrict or limit a county, vested with the power of eminent domain, in the use of public property for public purposes.

The trial court, relying on a line of older cases including Doan v....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases