MANCINA v. HOAR

Docket No. 19828.

129 Cal.App.3d 796 (1982)

181 Cal. Rptr. 347

PETER F. MANCINA et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. MARGARETHA M. HOAR, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

March 17, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

William H. White for Defendant and Appellant.

Lobner & Bull and Kneeland H. Lobner for Plaintiffs and Respondents.


OPINION

REYNOSO, J.*

At issue in this appeal is the proper means of enforcing an alleged settlement agreement. Defendant and appellant Margaretha M. Hoar contends the "speaking motion" procedure employed by plaintiffs is improper and the motion should have been treated as a motion for summary judgment. We agree. We reverse the judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs after the trial court granted their...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases