GLAZE, Judge.
Appellants were each charged and convicted of the manufacture of a controlled substance, marijuana, in violation of Ark. Stat.Ann. § 82-2617 (Supp.1981).
I. THE MOTION TO SUPPRESS SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED
In this argument, appellants rely heavily on the holding in Sanders v. State, 264 Ark. 433,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.