IN RE GOLDSTAUB


90 N.J. 1 (1982)

446 A.2d 1192

IN THE MATTER OF SEYMOUR GOLDSTAUB, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 16, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Colette A. Coolbaugh, Secretary, argued the cause for complainant Disciplinary Review Board.

Libero D. Marotta argued the cause for respondent.


PER CURIAM.

Respondent, a member of the bar since 1960, has been the subject of some 30 ethical complaints during his professional career. From November 23, 1971 to November 14, 1972, he was suspended from the practice of law for failing to respond to a consolidated statement of charges filed by the Hudson County Ethics Committee. The thread running through respondent's ethical history is a failure to attend to his basic responsibilities to his clients, to the profession...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases