Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In our opinion, the appellants have not presented competent evidence demonstrating that the previously ordered joint trial is likely to prejudice the executors as defendants in Actions Nos. 1 and 2 and Alice Liss as a third-party defendant in Actions Nos. 2 and 3. We note that the record does not contain excerpts from examinations before trial or statements of witnesses. Appellants' fears are based upon attorney speculation...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.