Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion to dismiss granted.
Even if it could be said that plaintiff's acts of depositing 10% of the purchase price of the real property in question in escrow, and his ordering of certain investigative reports were unequivocally referable to the challenged contract for its purchase and sale (see Wilson v La Van,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
