1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 89 A.D.2d
  5. 89 A.D.2d 817 (1982)
 

DANO v. ROYAL GLOBE INS. CO.

89 A.D.2d 817 (1982)

Frank S. Dano et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Royal Globe Insurance Company et al., Defendants, and William S. Andrews et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Andrews, Huffman & Donnelly, Appellants-Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

July 9, 1982

Order unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. Motion for discovery denied.

Memorandum:

This is an action by insureds against their fire insurance company, defendant Royal Globe Insurance Company, the broker who issued the policy, defendant Turnbull, the insurer's attorneys, defendants Andrews, Huffman and Donnelly, and the insurer's claims manager and adjuster, defendant DeDomenico. On January 31, 1980...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases