CIMINO v. DILL

No. 81-2517.

108 Ill. App.3d 782 (1982)

439 N.E.2d 980

JOSEPH J. CIMINO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CONRAD DILL et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Appellate Court of Illinois — First District (5th Division).

Opinion filed August 20, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James N. Vail, of Chicago, for appellants.

William Biederman, of Marks, Katz, Randall, Weinberg & Blatt, of Chicago, for appellee.


Judgment affirmed.

JUSTICE LORENZ delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff Joseph Cimino filed an action seeking a declaration that various restrictive covenants did not preclude him from constructing and operating medical offices on property he purchased in an Elk Grove Village subdivision. On remand from a prior appeal (Cimino v. Dill (1980), 92 Ill.App.3d 345 ("Cimino I")), the trial court construed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases