Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The evidence adduced at the hearing amply supports the finding of the Family Court that the natural father did not maintain "substantial and continuous or repeated contact" with his children as defined by subdivision (d) of section 111 of the Domestic Relations Law. Accordingly, the Family Court correctly held that the natural father had abandoned his children (see Matter of Corey L v Martin L,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.