NAKASONE v. RANDALL

Docket No. 63332.

129 Cal.App.3d 757 (1982)

181 Cal. Rptr. 324

FRANCIS NAKASONE, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent, v. VERLIE RANDALL, as Administrator, etc., Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

March 15, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Rezac, Stroud & Suhr and Randy L. Kuckuck for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant.

Davis & Davis and M. Stephen Davis for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

LILLIE, Acting P.J.

Defendant appeals from order denying motion to quash a prejudgment writ of attachment. The primary appellate issue is whether the claim upon which the cause of action is based arose out of the defendant's conduct of a trade, business or profession.

On May 5, 1980, plaintiff filed suit to recover damages for breach of contract for sale of real property by defendant, a resident of Guadalajara, Jalisco...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases