1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 423 So.2d
  5. 423 So.2d 451 (1982)
 

CITY OF ALACHUA v. MATILSKY

No. AL-139.

423 So.2d 451 (1982)

CITY OF ALACHUA, Florida, a Municipal Corporation, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Herbert MATILSKY, Barbara Matilsky, Rupert Murphy, Robert N. Worth, Robert W. Rogers, Kenneth M. Brown, Viola M. Brown, and Jule E. Schmidt, Appellees and Cross-Appellants.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 1, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allison E. Folds, of Watson, Folds, Steadham, Sproull, Christmann & Brashear, Gainesville, for appellant and cross-appellee.

David LaCroix, Gainesville, for appellees and cross-appellants.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Chief Judge.

The trial court correctly held, at the instance of appellee Schmidt, that Alachua's ordinances annexing certain territory violate the contiguity requirement and other requirements of chapter 171, Florida Statutes. We find it unnecessary to reach, and so do not decide, questions on the cross-appeal concerning the standing of other objectors.

AFFIRMED.

McCORD and MILLS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases