BERRY v. SPRINGDALE WATER & SEWER COMMISSION

No. 81-266.

635 S.W.2d 236 (1982)

James E. BERRY and Joyce Berry, Appellants, v. SPRINGDALE WATER & SEWER COMMISSION, et al., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

Rehearing Denied July 19, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jones & Segers, Fayetteville, for appellants.

Davis & Bracey, P.A., Springdale, for appellees.


GEORGE ROSE SMITH, Justice.

This case must be affirmed because of flagrant deficiencies in the appellants' abstract of the record. Rule 9(d) requires that the abstract consist of an impartial condensation of such parts of the record as are necessary to an understanding of all questions presented for decision. In scores of cases we have discussed the essentials of a proper abstract of the record. In the case at bar the following statement from Collins v. Duncan...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases