NAT. SHOES v. ANNEX CAMERA


114 Misc.2d 751 (1982)

National Shoes, Inc., D.I.P, as Successor in Interest to Louis Joy Corporation, Petitioner, v. Annex Camera and Electronics, Inc., Respondent.

Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County.

July 9, 1982


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burns, Jackson, Summit, Rovins, Spitzer & Feldesman (David Rosenberg of counsel), for petitioner. Mark G. Fresco for respondent.


DAVID B. SAXE, J.

Must an alleged breach of a substantial obligation of a lease, that forms the basis of a notice to cure, be actually capable of being cured in order to sustain the petition in the ensuing summary holdover proceeding?

The respondent tenant contends that since the lease provides for a right to cure within a specified time period, a notice to cure, such as here, that is based upon past conduct

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases