PER CURIAM.
There was no error harmful to the plaintiff-appellant in the substantive judgments sought to be reviewed, which are therefore affirmed. Addressing the only viable question he raises on the merits, we find ample evidence to justify submission of the issue of contributory or comparative negligence to the jury. Seibels, Bruce & Co. v. Giddings,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.